dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition

Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 4.43 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
ok so it turns out that there's no actual punishment for violating the rules. proposition 14: if you break the rules your usertitle gets force-changed to "2 trash 4 trash". yes on 14
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
proposition chiseled slabs: rules aren't actually subject to enforcement until they're written in the stickied "what is hawkspace" thread. moderators with power over hawkspace after dark subforum are obligated to edit in all passed rule changes at their earliest convenience.
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
no on 14. yes on prop negatori

prop 15: the negaprop prop cannot be negapropped
[Image: msicon1.png][Image: msicon2.png]
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
yes on chiseled slabs. i'm still confused on what a negaprop is and though i like confusing, the whole point was to make voting super-simple, so...

i don't know, maybe explain it a little more? like, what does a "no" mean versus a "yes" on a negaprop? isn't this the same as the existing method of overturning-by-voting-against-until-2-or-less-net-yesses but with a limit on voting "no" on the negaprop (which could either mean in support of not-overturning or in support of overturning, depending)?
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
can't we repeal propositions with a proposition already?
[Image: egg005.png?raw=1][Image: egg005.png?raw=1][Image: egg005.png?raw=1]
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
like, a regular proposition
[Image: egg005.png?raw=1][Image: egg005.png?raw=1][Image: egg005.png?raw=1]
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
also yes on eagle
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
a negaprop has a different, slightly-harder-but-still-reasonable, pass condition. This way we don't have a series of first-to-three propositions trying to overturn an existing proposition. it's a clear motion to overturn an existing proposition, rather than suggesting something added/subtractive/otherwise confusing.

let's say a proposition got six "yes" votes and two "no" votes at the time you make your negaprop, so the neganaymeral is 4. you make your negaprop and folks start voting on it. if you hit 4 "yes"es before anyone votes "no", the original proposition is overturned.

if however someone votes "no" then obviously you're going to need more "yes" votes. i don't think dogpiling is fun for anyone, so the maximum that "no" votes can bump up a negaprop's pass threshold is three. that'd make the pass threshold 7 "yes" votes, which is a pretty tall order already unless the original proposition sucked serious ass.
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
but schazer if it sucked major ass it'd get 7 easily.

proposition: proper. all sentences must end in a period.
[Image: 933hfLL.png][Image: aCQpT7Z.png][Image: iRoHjKM.png]
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
yes on negatori

no on prop 14
(I want to amend/carify it)

yes on prop 15

no on proposition proper
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
no on prop proper

no on negaprops, i think people should be able to repeal propositions as easily as enact them
[Image: egg005.png?raw=1][Image: egg005.png?raw=1][Image: egg005.png?raw=1]
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
actual serious prop

proposition mean girls: you wont be punished for quoting a post that breaks rules
[Image: 933hfLL.png][Image: aCQpT7Z.png][Image: iRoHjKM.png]
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
you seem to be operating under the impression that it is necessary to have a separate proposition to repeal a proposition, but part of the beauty of the voting system as-is is that votes are never closed and you can repeal something already in-effect just by pushing it back under the 3-yes threshold (the yeshold, if you will allow me to portmanteau).

the neganaymeral is just net yesses, and for a negaprop you need to MEET the net yesses with a new batch of net nega-yesses (plus a maximum of 3 extra) whereas for a regular overturn you just need to meet the net posi-yesses, minus 3. since the proposal negatori does not take the already-existing overturning mechanism out-of-play, there's no reason anyone who wanted to overturn something would use it, since it only makes their goal harder. no on negatori
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
Proposition 16: If a post breaks any of the rules in HAD that were in effect at the time of its posting, and it is quoted in this thread with an explanation of which rule it is violating, then the poster who committed the violation will have their user title changed (by Schazer or Pinary) to "2 trash 4 trash."

Posts that quote rules violations in thread 1527 with the express purpose of pointing out the rules violation are not subject to the rules of hawkspace after dark.

The rulebreaker may change their title back at the earliest convenience with no penalty.

This rule is not retroactive; all posts made in HAD before Proposition 16 takes effect are not subject to the rules.

New rules don't work retroactively unless explicitly claimed otherwise.
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
yes on prop 16
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
yes on mean girls

please
[Image: 933hfLL.png][Image: aCQpT7Z.png][Image: iRoHjKM.png]
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
yes on mean girls
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
No on prop 16
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
(04-27-2016, 01:51 AM)a52 Wrote: »
(04-27-2016, 01:42 AM)a52 Wrote: »also prop 12: trol seasson is the hawkpsace after dark national anthem

yes on prop 12

yes on prop 12

yes on meangirls

prop 673: no tricking in had
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
no on prop 16 because I want to add amnesty for people who weren't aware kinda-arbirary silly rules were in effect.

no on mean girls cuz all you gotta do is quote a rulebreaking post then you yourself can break rules with impunity (at least in the current phrasing).

---

Proposition Chiselled Slabs x2 combo: Rules in effect are split into golden rules[/b] and [color=piss]piss rules. All rules active at the time Proposition CSx2C are golden rules, golden rules become piss rules with a passed proposition for such.

Any thread may cast a first-to-three vote within its readership to render piss rules ineffective within the thread. the OP should edit to indicate which rules are no longer enforced via this vote.


---

Examples for piss rules would be stuff about formatting or nocaps/allcaps
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
i cant believe none of you want to help me pass porp gay which literally can only serve the purpose of me bullying jac more effectively because no one else would use it what the fuck guys

anyway as a general rule i think the part where we start to try to actually like, punish people for rule breaking rules that arent real rules is where things go haywire and by that mark thats why i dont think that three to win works as a general thing because honestly, i dont think voting for making rules choices works at all in this scenario/space bc its like

in hawkspace id only vote for something if its funny and if an actual serious thing happened i would, not want that to be resolved with voting a punishment or solution, because an Actual Serious Thing Happening means it needs to be dealt with For Real and mafia/nomic esque tallies or whatever dont feel to me like tthey automatically mean Actual Discussion which is what would be Actually Required for some things

i dont think it works at all for hawkspace, basically, but thats just my onion and also i barely care so, ignore this if you want!
I wanna be a real friend, Don't wanna break when I bend
I wanna a be no seeker, I wanna scream eureka
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
there's a rule in nomic that i'd like to remind us of: no punishment worse than losing.
[Image: msicon1.png][Image: msicon2.png]
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
no on 14
no on negatori
no on 15
yes on chiseled slabs
no on proper
yes on mean girls
no on 16
no on 673
no on chiselled slabs x2 combo
yes on gay

why do we need a system of punishment
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
we don;t/
[Image: msicon1.png][Image: msicon2.png]
Quote
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
the real punishment is the friends we made along the way
Quote