Eagle TimeRegisterLogin

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 5 Votes - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
wonderings
Author Message
a52
 RE: wonderings
Post: #26
do not look directly at the asymptote

Offline
Posts: 2,588
Joined: Jan 2016
Location: seattle, mostly
were the actions of the simulators in the talos principle ethical?

I love my job | I hate my job | War is hell | My job is war
The noises, they never stop


[Image: egg006.png?raw=1]
02-03-2017 03:16 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
a52
 RE: wonderings
Post: #27
do not look directly at the asymptote

Offline
Posts: 2,588
Joined: Jan 2016
Location: seattle, mostly
most people do believe that animals should be afforded at least some of the ethical considerations we apply to humans, generally more the more intelligent the animal is. dolphins, elephants, high primates and certain parrots have rudimentary cultures and civilizations, as well as being capable of logically solving problems, feeling empathy towards members of their own species, their caretakers, and others, and feeling emotion and pain.
if this is the case, isn't what we're doing to these species through hunting and habitat loss comparable to how europeans abused african tribes in the late 19th century?

I love my job | I hate my job | War is hell | My job is war
The noises, they never stop


[Image: egg006.png?raw=1]
02-03-2017 03:38 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Wheat
 RE: wonderings
Post: #28
 

Offline
Posts: 4,792
Joined: Jul 2011
that is not a good comparison and there's a lot to unpack with it.

[Image: RjvYOd.png]
02-03-2017 03:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
a52
 RE: wonderings
Post: #29
do not look directly at the asymptote

Offline
Posts: 2,588
Joined: Jan 2016
Location: seattle, mostly
okay.

I love my job | I hate my job | War is hell | My job is war
The noises, they never stop


[Image: egg006.png?raw=1]
02-03-2017 04:01 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
☆ C.H.W.O.K.A ☆
 RE: wonderings
Post: #30
i'm rad as hell, and i'm not gonna take it anymore

Offline
Posts: 3,169
Joined: Aug 2011
Location: Male
(02-03-2017 03:15 AM)a52 Wrote:  if you perfectly simulated, atom by atom, a human being in a room, would they be conscious? sure, they could calculate and have internal thoughts. they could feel emotion and have opinions. they would THINK they were just as conscious as everybody else. but would they really have a sort of "point of view" the same way we do? or would their existence be like that of a calculation machine, grinding gears and sending signals but not actually, you know, seeing out of their own eyes?

your own self and brain is just atoms making meat and chemicals and blood and shit, just a meat computer calculating and sending signals. so the theoretical 1:1 simulation or replica is just as "alive" as any human, unless you have some notion of a soul
02-06-2017 09:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Wheat
 RE: wonderings
Post: #31
 

Offline
Posts: 4,792
Joined: Jul 2011
soul .exe

[Image: RjvYOd.png]
02-06-2017 09:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
a52
 RE: wonderings
Post: #32
do not look directly at the asymptote

Offline
Posts: 2,588
Joined: Jan 2016
Location: seattle, mostly
consider some function that is zero at every point. now set the output of some input x0 as f(x0), where f is some differentiable function (say, f(x) = x2), so that the function is zero everywhere except at that point. now set some other point x1 to equal f(x1). repeat this process uncountably infinitely many times, until this new function equals f at every point.

is this function continuous and differentiable?

it seems like it's not, because at every point in its creation, it's just a string of points. then again, it seems like it is, because it equals f at every point, and f is both continuous and differentiable. then again, maybe making a function like this is impossible, because you have to do uncountably many definitions in order to cover the reals, and the whole point of uncountable numbers is that even with infinite time, you can't do uncountably many things.

but if you can't construct a function like this, how can you construct any function? what does continuity even mean, anyway? now that i think about it, the ideas of limits and continuity seem even more shaky than the infinitesimals they were meant to replace. they make sense, but they don't seem like they could ever be rigorously justified.

I love my job | I hate my job | War is hell | My job is war
The noises, they never stop


[Image: egg006.png?raw=1]
(This post was last modified: 03-16-2017 01:45 AM by a52.)
03-16-2017 01:44 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
a52
 RE: wonderings
Post: #33
do not look directly at the asymptote

Offline
Posts: 2,588
Joined: Jan 2016
Location: seattle, mostly
even harder question: why am i pondering the nature of continuity and the real line when i should be doing my overdue history homework? it's a mystery.

I love my job | I hate my job | War is hell | My job is war
The noises, they never stop


[Image: egg006.png?raw=1]
03-16-2017 01:47 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
a52
 RE: wonderings
Post: #34
do not look directly at the asymptote

Offline
Posts: 2,588
Joined: Jan 2016
Location: seattle, mostly
dear god, there's nothing scarier than the interval (0, 1).

(with the exception, perhaps, of 5-page essays on the civil war)

I love my job | I hate my job | War is hell | My job is war
The noises, they never stop


[Image: egg006.png?raw=1]
03-16-2017 01:53 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kíeros
 RE: wonderings
Post: #35
🌈🐙👽 (gay tentacle alien)

Offline
Posts: 2,667
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: ρ(∂v/∂t+v•∇v)= -∇p+∇•T+f
I think that provided there is some open interval (xn-δ,xn+δ) in which every point had been mapped to the continuous and differentiable function after uncountably many steps, then the function at xn would be continuous and differentiable.
The problem is that any function fn(x) does not fit this criterion, because you are going one point at a time, so it's a countably infinite number, so we can do a diagonal proof to find a point however close to xn that is still 0, and so at no time would it be continuous.

🐦🐙🐙[Image: nifOFwR.png]🐙🐙
03-16-2017 03:16 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
a52
 RE: wonderings
Post: #36
do not look directly at the asymptote

Offline
Posts: 2,588
Joined: Jan 2016
Location: seattle, mostly
(03-16-2017 01:44 AM)a52 Wrote:  continuity????????

related: https://www.youtube.com/#/watch?v=D2xYjiL8yyE

I love my job | I hate my job | War is hell | My job is war
The noises, they never stop


[Image: egg006.png?raw=1]
03-16-2017 04:40 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
a52
 RE: wonderings
Post: #37
do not look directly at the asymptote

Offline
Posts: 2,588
Joined: Jan 2016
Location: seattle, mostly
If asked to find a random integer on (0, ∞), the only sensible answers are 0 and ∞.

I love my job | I hate my job | War is hell | My job is war
The noises, they never stop


[Image: egg006.png?raw=1]
(This post was last modified: 04-06-2017 04:52 PM by a52.)
04-06-2017 04:52 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

Post Reply